I'm curious about your opinion. Please tick an answer in the poll to the right and share your thoughts below.
Are those who we trust to lead us properly considering the risk burden from spent nuclear fuel, unabated release of carbon dioxide, hydro station dam failure, and wind turbine installation and maintenance?
What about the risk of a nuclear accident vs. the failure of a fly ash storage pond?
Do those considerations justly and completely consider likelihood as well as consequence? Is this based on real events or estimates and calculations?
Are those who we trust to lead us properly considering the risk burden from spent nuclear fuel, unabated release of carbon dioxide, hydro station dam failure, and wind turbine installation and maintenance?
What about the risk of a nuclear accident vs. the failure of a fly ash storage pond?
Do those considerations justly and completely consider likelihood as well as consequence? Is this based on real events or estimates and calculations?
Posts
