tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post5690055492871352913..comments2023-09-25T21:20:27.863+10:00Comments on Nuclear Australia: Green nuclear power coming to NorwayEdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-70019172656318208892007-05-25T18:57:00.000+10:002007-05-25T18:57:00.000+10:00I agree.I don't think Thorium is a magic bullet in...I agree.<BR/><BR/>I don't think Thorium is a magic bullet in and of itself and the end result will certainly be virtually indistinguishable from 'some' of the GenIV reactor designs - not all are fast spectrum.<BR/><BR/>I do see the Thorium path winning with respect to sustainability and energy independence though (more of it, and in more places) - albeit not by much. Also, I admit that most of Edhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-62470868130601309142007-05-25T14:48:00.000+10:002007-05-25T14:48:00.000+10:00It seems to me that articles like this have a habi...It seems to me that articles like this have a habit of romanticising Thorium as something magical, when most of the positive things they're ascribing to Thorium aren't due to Thorium, but due to Generation IV reactors in general.<BR/><BR/>Make no mistake, i completely support nuclear energy, the roll-out of workable Gen. IV prototypes, and the use of Thorium as part of a sustainable long-term Lukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05092902410659259688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-12894298114913832402007-05-24T20:57:00.000+10:002007-05-24T20:57:00.000+10:00Ok - job done (at least I hope).Better now???Ok - job done (at least I hope).<BR/><BR/>Better now???Edhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-28197525633921109932007-05-24T20:05:00.000+10:002007-05-24T20:05:00.000+10:00Thanks for the comment.It's one of my shortcomings...Thanks for the comment.<BR/><BR/>It's one of my shortcomings that I didn't really bother to learn 'netiquette' up front, but rely more on being 'calibrated' like this. I was wondering about acceptable protocol. I don't believe I'm breaking a law - if so, please let me know which one.<BR/><BR/>Since none of the related media outlets ever complained about my postings - despite me making comments Edhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-49849082603054093582007-05-24T19:34:00.000+10:002007-05-24T19:34:00.000+10:00Great that you like the article in Cosmos Magazine...Great that you like the article in Cosmos Magazine, but you are violalting their copyright by republishing it in total! Correct netiquette is to take a few paragraphs and link back to the article on the Cosmos site - not strip it holus bolus and paste it on your site. If they don't get any page impressions from people reading about this, they'll think no-one's interested in the topic. So Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07723373802494491297noreply@blogger.com