tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post7117802103343217153..comments2023-09-25T21:20:27.863+10:00Comments on Nuclear Australia: Last week's video - Tim Flannery interviewEdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-80692561933785036182007-10-13T01:50:00.000+10:002007-10-13T01:50:00.000+10:00Hi Luke.Thanks for the comment.I don't have a prob...Hi Luke.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the comment.<BR/><BR/>I don't have a problem with Flannery's comments. Few of us are machines, capable of 100% consistency. In general his comments are supportive of nuclear power's role in the reduction of emissions. But I think we agree on this.<BR/><BR/>Regarding the last quote - I suspect what he is doing is connecting the dots as follows:<BR/><BR/>As Australia's Edhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-41812342114118123622007-10-13T00:50:00.000+10:002007-10-13T00:50:00.000+10:00Flannery says some interesting and often contradic...Flannery says some interesting and often contradictory-sounding things about nuclear energy.<BR/><BR/>It's pretty clear that he believes in attacking the carbon dioxide issue with everything we've got to throw at it, as fast as possible, and that nuclear clearly has a role to play in that.<BR/><BR/>http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/nuclear-way-to-go-flannery/2006/08/04/1154198331848.html<BR/Lukehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05092902410659259688noreply@blogger.com