tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post7568196858525348616..comments2023-09-25T21:20:27.863+10:00Comments on Nuclear Australia: Canadian government to overrule independent regulatory bodyEdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-6598658482546195242007-12-13T04:39:00.000+11:002007-12-13T04:39:00.000+11:00I take your point. Of particular interest is that ...I take your point. Of particular interest is that Canadian lawmakers sited 'independent expertise' concluding the reactor could safely operate [isn't the regulator deemed to be an independent body of experts?].<BR/><BR/>But this is certainly a very simplistic view from the outside and there are overarching risks - other than nuclear safety - to consider as you say. As the following days unfold, IEdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00021931700499537674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-451989601890385172.post-9724926741431405232007-12-13T04:11:00.000+11:002007-12-13T04:11:00.000+11:00This could be a good decision. I haven't really ex...This could be a good decision. I haven't really examined it yet.<BR/><BR/>There are risks on both courses of action. That is the truth that needs to be examined here. The CNSC is concerned over the risk of reactor problems; the health profession is presumably concerned over the risk to patients. The government should be concerned to balance those two risks and find the best solution. <BR/><BR/>IfJoffanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18025437863119781181noreply@blogger.com