As reported at news.com.au:
Nothing too surprising... the carbon trading scheme is to start moderately (nothing to rash before 2012) and build to become much more intense over time. Any other approach would damage the economy and Australia's energy-intensive [carbon-intensive] industries.
The article doesn't quote anything as definitive as its headline with respect to nuclear power, merely that it - along with the other usual suspects - be kept as an option.
I look forward to reading the report. As of this posting there is no link yet. But eventually readers may be able to find the full report here.
Nothing too surprising... the carbon trading scheme is to start moderately (nothing to rash before 2012) and build to become much more intense over time. Any other approach would damage the economy and Australia's energy-intensive [carbon-intensive] industries.
The article doesn't quote anything as definitive as its headline with respect to nuclear power, merely that it - along with the other usual suspects - be kept as an option.
I look forward to reading the report. As of this posting there is no link yet. But eventually readers may be able to find the full report here.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment